$E/ACC vs $WOULD: social heat, real people, market size
Effective accelerationism has a Heat Score of 0 with 6 contributors in 24h; would scores 63 with 15. $WOULD has 2.5× the human conversation of $E/ACC, while $WOULD is 341.9× larger by market cap.
| Metric | $E/ACC | $WOULD |
|---|---|---|
| Heat Score | 0 () | 63 (Hot) |
| Contributors 24h | 6 | 15 |
| Interactions 24h | 1.8K | 1.3K |
| Posts 24h | 6 | 17 |
| Sentiment | 100/100 | 100/100 |
| Spam share 7d | — | 41.9% |
| Price | $0.0001092 | $0.03736 |
| 24h change | -9.9% | -49.1% |
| Market cap | $109.21K | $37.34M |
| Rank | #2762 | #463 |
| From all-time high | — | -94.9% |
| Age | 23 months old | 2.1 years old |
| Chain | solana | solana |
| DEX liquidity | $78.34K | $986.72K |
| CEX listings | 0 | 0 |
| Social dominance | 0.001% | 0.003% |
Both columns come from the same sources at nearly the same time (this page: Sep 5, 01:14 UTC; would: Sep 5, 06:09 UTC). Heat measures conversation, not value.
Where $E/ACC stands in the memecoin rankings
$E/ACC is not in a MemeHeat top 10 right now — the rankings below show who is.
Other memecoins you may want to check
Compare side by side: $E/ACC vs $COPPERINU · $E/ACC vs $PUMP · $E/ACC vs $DJT · $E/ACC vs $BITTY · $E/ACC vs $SHRUB