$E/ACC vs $SHARBI: social heat, real people, market size
Effective accelerationism has a Heat Score of 0 with 6 contributors in 24h; SHARBI scores 63 with 35. $SHARBI has 5.8× the human conversation of $E/ACC, while $SHARBI is 1.3× larger by market cap.
| Metric | $E/ACC | $SHARBI |
|---|---|---|
| Heat Score | 0 () | 63 (Hot) |
| Contributors 24h | 6 | 35 |
| Interactions 24h | 1.8K | 48.9K |
| Posts 24h | 6 | 42 |
| Sentiment | 100/100 | 100/100 |
| Spam share 7d | — | 4.9% |
| Price | $0.0001092 | $0.000001829 |
| 24h change | -9.9% | +5.1% |
| Market cap | $109.21K | $142.80K |
| Rank | #2762 | #2655 |
| From all-time high | — | -90.5% |
| Age | 23 months old | 6.6 years old |
| Chain | solana | ethereum, arbitrum, base, solana |
| DEX liquidity | $78.34K | — |
| CEX listings | 0 | 0 |
| Social dominance | 0.001% | 0.009% |
Both columns come from the same sources at nearly the same time (this page: Sep 5, 01:14 UTC; SHARBI: Sep 1, 02:24 UTC). Heat measures conversation, not value.
Where $E/ACC stands in the memecoin rankings
$E/ACC is not in a MemeHeat top 10 right now — the rankings below show who is.
Other memecoins you may want to check
Compare side by side: $E/ACC vs $COPPERINU · $E/ACC vs $PUMP · $E/ACC vs $DJT · $E/ACC vs $BITTY · $E/ACC vs $SHRUB