$E/ACC vs $QUACK: social heat, real people, market size
Effective accelerationism has a Heat Score of 0 with 6 contributors in 24h; RichQuack scores 83 with 6. $E/ACC has 1.0× the human conversation of $QUACK, while $QUACK is 14.9× larger by market cap.
| Metric | $E/ACC | $QUACK |
|---|---|---|
| Heat Score | 0 () | 83 (On fire) |
| Contributors 24h | 6 | 6 |
| Interactions 24h | 1.8K | 910 |
| Posts 24h | 6 | 7 |
| Sentiment | 100/100 | 100/100 |
| Spam share 7d | — | 19.4% |
| Price | $0.0001092 | $0.000000000037 |
| 24h change | -9.9% | +8.3% |
| Market cap | $109.21K | $1.62M |
| Rank | #2762 | #1572 |
| From all-time high | — | -99.8% |
| Age | 23 months old | 5.2 years old |
| Chain | solana | bnbchain, solana |
| DEX liquidity | $78.34K | $20.49K |
| CEX listings | 0 | 0 |
| Social dominance | 0.001% | 0.001% |
Both columns come from the same sources at nearly the same time (this page: Sep 5, 01:14 UTC; RichQuack: Aug 31, 02:19 UTC). Heat measures conversation, not value.
Where $E/ACC stands in the memecoin rankings
$E/ACC is not in a MemeHeat top 10 right now — the rankings below show who is.
Other memecoins you may want to check
Compare side by side: $E/ACC vs $COPPERINU · $E/ACC vs $PUMP · $E/ACC vs $DJT · $E/ACC vs $BITTY · $E/ACC vs $SHRUB