$E/ACC vs $PUFF: social heat, real people, market size
Effective accelerationism has a Heat Score of 0 with 6 contributors in 24h; Puff The Dragon scores 100 with 3. $E/ACC has 2.0× the human conversation of $PUFF, while $PUFF is 47.2× larger by market cap.
| Metric | $E/ACC | $PUFF |
|---|---|---|
| Heat Score | 0 () | 100 (On fire) |
| Contributors 24h | 6 | 3 |
| Interactions 24h | 1.8K | 267 |
| Posts 24h | 6 | 8 |
| Sentiment | 100/100 | 33/100 |
| Spam share 7d | — | 12.0% |
| Price | $0.0001092 | $0.005804 |
| 24h change | -9.9% | +2.5% |
| Market cap | $109.21K | $5.16M |
| Rank | #2762 | #1130 |
| From all-time high | — | -98.2% |
| Age | 23 months old | 3.8 years old |
| Chain | solana | ethereum |
| DEX liquidity | $78.34K | — |
| CEX listings | 0 | 1 |
| Social dominance | 0.001% | 0.001% |
Both columns come from the same sources at nearly the same time (this page: Sep 5, 01:14 UTC; Puff The Dragon: Sep 5, 00:55 UTC). Heat measures conversation, not value.
Where $E/ACC stands in the memecoin rankings
$E/ACC is not in a MemeHeat top 10 right now — the rankings below show who is.
Other memecoins you may want to check
Compare side by side: $E/ACC vs $COPPERINU · $E/ACC vs $PUMP · $E/ACC vs $DJT · $E/ACC vs $BITTY · $E/ACC vs $SHRUB