$E/ACC vs $FWA: social heat, real people, market size
Effective Accelerationism has a Heat Score of 0 with 453 contributors in 24h; Fake World Assets scores 50 with 41. $E/ACC has 11.0× the human conversation of $FWA, while $FWA is 67.8× larger by market cap.
| Metric | $E/ACC | $FWA |
|---|---|---|
| Heat Score | 0 () | 50 (Warm) |
| Contributors 24h | 453 | 41 |
| Interactions 24h | 502.9K | 6.2K |
| Posts 24h | 1,054 | 66 |
| Sentiment | 88/100 | 94/100 |
| Spam share 7d | — | 5.0% |
| Price | $0.0001254 | $0.008589 |
| 24h change | +0.6% | -8.8% |
| Market cap | $125.33K | $8.50M |
| Rank | #2866 | #1100 |
| From all-time high | — | -78.6% |
| Age | 24 months old | 18 months old |
| Chain | solana | |
| DEX liquidity | $91.35K | — |
| CEX listings | 0 | 1 |
| Social dominance | 0.195% | 0.013% |
Both columns come from the same sources at nearly the same time (this page: Oct 4, 02:26 UTC; Fake World Assets: Oct 17, 01:42 UTC). Heat measures conversation, not value.
Trade $E/ACC or $FWA
Both are memecoins: prices can swing hard in either direction and neither comparison above is a reason to buy. Information, not financial advice.
Trade on BybitWhere $E/ACC stands in the memecoin rankings
$E/ACC is currently #9 in Most talked-about memecoins today, #6 in Top Solana memecoins today.
Other memecoins you may want to check
Compare side by side: $E/ACC vs $HEEHAW · $E/ACC vs $ANTHROPIC · $E/ACC vs $DONT · $E/ACC vs $PSYOPANIME · $E/ACC vs $CYBERCAT